linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/12] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: mark OF related data as maybe unused

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 20:14:34 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
        Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: mark OF related data as
 maybe unused

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:32:52PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The driver can be compile tested with !CONFIG_OF making certain data
> unused:
> 
>   drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c:1888:34: error: ‘xway_gphy_match’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---

Do you happen to have any context as to why of_match_node() without
CONFIG_OF is implemented as:

#define of_match_node(_matches, _node)	NULL

and not as:

static inline const struct of_device_id *
of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
	      const struct device_node *node)
{
	return NULL;
}

?

Generally, the static inline shim function model is nicer, because it
allows us to not scatter __maybe_unused all around.