[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11A8071B-D9FC-418A-B0B5-D2AE608F740A@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 21:29:06 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org
CC: catalin.marinas@....com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, quic_qiancai@...cinc.com,
valentin.schneider@....com, will@...nel.org, woodylin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu()
>Hm, in the !CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD case, idle_thread_get() will
>have returned NULL. Won't these then crash?
>
>Admittedly that seems to be *only* for UM, as all other architectures
>with SMP seem to set CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD.
UM doesn't even have SMP, so maybe CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD can just be removed?
johannes
--
Sent from my phone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists