linux-kernel - Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 08/18] net: ethernet: mtk_eth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAzlxF6LaMSdOdIL@makrotopia.org>
Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 20:34:12 +0000
From:   Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jianhui Zhao <zhaojh329@...il.com>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
        Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 08/18] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc:
 fix 1000Base-X and 2500Base-X modes

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 08:02:47PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 02:51:27PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 11. März 2023 um 13:05 Uhr
> > > > Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. März 2023 um 16:24 Uhr
> > > > > Von: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > > > > It would be nice to add these to my database - please send me the
> > > > > > > output of ethtool -m $iface raw on > foo.bin for each module.
> > > > > 
> > > > > so if you can do that for me, then I can see whether it's likely that
> > > > > the patches that are already in mainline will do anything to solve
> > > > > the workaround you've had to add for the hw signals.
> > > > 
> > > > i got the 2.5G copper sfps, and tried them...they work well with the v12 (including this patch), but not in v13...
> > > > 
> > > > i dumped the eeprom like you mention for your database:
> > > > 
> > > > $ hexdump -C 2g5_sfp.bin 
> > > > 00000000  03 04 07 00 01 00 00 00  00 02 00 05 19 00 00 00  |................|
> > > > 00000010  1e 14 00 00 4f 45 4d 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  |....OEM         |
> > > > 00000020  20 20 20 20 00 00 00 00  53 46 50 2d 32 2e 35 47  |    ....SFP-2.5G|
> > > > 00000030  2d 54 20 20 20 20 20 20  31 2e 30 20 03 52 00 19  |-T      1.0 .R..|
> > > > 00000040  00 1a 00 00 53 4b 32 33  30 31 31 31 30 30 30 38  |....SK2301110008|
> > > > 00000050  20 20 20 20 32 33 30 31  31 30 20 20 68 f0 01 e8  |    230110  h...|
> > > > 00000060  00 00 11 37 4f 7a dc ff  3d c0 6e 74 9b 7c 06 ca  |...7Oz..=.nt.|..|
> > > > 00000070  e1 d0 f9 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 08 f0 fc 64  |...............d|
> > > > 00000080  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> > > > *
> > > > 00000100  5f 00 ce 00 5a 00 d3 00  8c a0 75 30 88 b8 79 18  |_...Z.....u0..y.|
> > > > 00000110  1d 4c 01 f4 19 64 03 e8  4d f0 06 30 3d e8 06 f2  |.L...d..M..0=...|
> > > > 00000120  2b d4 00 c7 27 10 00 df  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |+...'...........|
> > > > 00000130  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> > > > 00000140  00 00 00 00 3f 80 00 00  00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00  |....?...........|
> > > > 00000150  01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00  01 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1  |................|
> > > > 00000160  29 1a 82 41 0b b8 13 88  0f a0 ff ff ff ff 80 ff  |)..A............|
> > > > 00000170  00 00 ff ff 00 00 ff ff  04 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00  |................|
> > > > 00000180  43 4e 53 38 54 55 54 41  41 43 33 30 2d 31 34 31  |CNS8TUTAAC30-141|
> > > > 00000190  30 2d 30 34 56 30 34 20  49 fb 46 00 00 00 00 29  |0-04V04 I.F....)|
> > > > 000001a0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> > > > 000001b0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 aa aa  |................|
> > > > 000001c0  47 4c 43 2d 54 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  |GLC-T           |
> > > > 000001d0  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 97  |               .|
> > > > 000001e0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> > > > 000001f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 40 00 40 00 00 00 00  |.........@.@....|
> > > > 
> > > > how can we add a quirk to support this?
> > > 
> > > tried to add the quirk like this onto v13
> > > 
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> > > @@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static const struct sfp_quirk sfp_quirks[] = {
> > >         SFP_QUIRK_F("OEM", "RTSFP-10G", sfp_fixup_rollball_cc),
> > >         SFP_QUIRK_F("Turris", "RTSFP-10", sfp_fixup_rollball),
> > >         SFP_QUIRK_F("Turris", "RTSFP-10G", sfp_fixup_rollball),
> > > +
> > > +       SFP_QUIRK_M("OEM", "SFP-2.5G-T", sfp_quirk_2500basex),
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > but still no link...
> > > 
> > > how can i verify the quirk was applied? see only this in dmesg:
> > > 
> > > [    2.192274] sfp sfp-1: module OEM              SFP-2.5G-T       rev 1.0  sn SK2301110008     dc 230110  
> > > 
> > > also tried to force speed (module should support 100/1000/2500), but it seems i can set speed option only on
> > > gmac (eth1) and not on the sfp (phy).
> > > 
> > > i guess between mac and sfp speed is always 2500base-X and after the phy (if there is any) the link speed is
> > > maybe different.
> > 
> > As discussed in the previous iteration of the series where I suggested to
> > add work-arounds disabling in-band AN for 1000Base-X and 2500Base-X having
> > those will also affect fiber transceivers which transparently pass-through
> > the electrical SerDes signal into light. Russell explained it very well
> > and I now agree that a good solution would be to add a new SFP quirk
> > indicating that a SFP module got a "hidden" PHY which doesn't like in-band
> > autonegotiation.
> 
> I do not believe that fibre SFPs have hidden PHYs that disrupt the
> autonegotiation. What makes you think that they do?

This is not a fiber SFP, but rather a 2500Base-T RJ-45 module.
Hence it quite certainly has some kind of PHY.

> Do you have
> autonegotiation working with some fibre SFP modules but not other
> fibre modules?

I've tried only with one 1000Base-SX module and can confirm (like
Frank already did in your previous discussion some weeks ago) that
with that autonegotiation is working fine. Only those RJ-45 which
do not expose the PHY via i2c-mdio are problematic apparently, as
Linux/phylink *assumes* that they do in-band AN, but at least some
of them don't.