[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB6734CD5D93F411EA5D701265A8BB9@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 21:29:33 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Kang, Shan" <shan.kang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 00/34] x86: enable FRED for x86-64
> The following issues are seen in this round of test.
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | | x86:test_ | bpf:test_progs | x86:sysret |
> | | vsyscall_32 | | _rip_64 |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | the 7th | | | |
> | Intel(R) | FAIL | FAIL | PASS |
> | Core(TM) CPU | | | |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | the 7th | | | |
> | Intel(R) | | | |
> | Core(TM) CPU | FAIL | FAIL | PASS |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ w/ | | | |
> | FRED patch set | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | Intel Simics® | | | |
> | Simulator w/o | FAIL | FAIL | PASS |
> | FRED model | | | |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | Intel Simics® | | | |
> | Simulator w/o | | | |
> | FRED model | FAIL | FAIL | PASS |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ w/ | | | |
> | FRED patch set | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | Intel Simics® | | | |
> | Simulator w/ | PASS | FAIL | PASS |
> | FRED model | | | |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | Intel Simics® | | | |
> | Simulator w/ | | | |
> | FRED model | PASS | FAIL | PASS |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ w/ | | | |
> | FRED patch set | | | |
> | FRED disabled | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
> | Intel Simics® | | | |
> | Simulator w/ | | | |
> | FRED model | PASS | HANG | FAIL |
> | 6.3.0-rc1+ w/ | | | |
> | FRED patch set | | | |
> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
>
> The "x86:test_vsyscall_32" is a regression since the v3 FRED patch set.
The "x86:test_vsyscall_32" test passes on the Simics FRED model, no matter
whether FRED is enabled or not, because the Simics FRED model has the RDPID
instruction support.
While on a Simics non-FRED model or the test bare metal machine, which
don't have the RDPID instruction support, the test reads CPU ID from the
GDT_ENTRY_CPUNODE entry, thus it fails due to:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230311084824.2340-1-xin3.li@intel.com/
Thanks!
Xin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists