[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230312112302.466886-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 07:23:02 -0400
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: bskeggs@...hat.com, kherbst@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/mc: set ga100_mc_device storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c:51:1:
warning: symbol 'ga100_mc_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
ga100_mc_device is only used in ga100.c, so it should be static
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c
index 1e2eabec1a76..5d28d30d09d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mc/ga100.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ ga100_mc_device_enabled(struct nvkm_mc *mc, u32 mask)
return (nvkm_rd32(mc->subdev.device, 0x000600) & mask) == mask;
}
-const struct nvkm_mc_device_func
+static const struct nvkm_mc_device_func
ga100_mc_device = {
.enabled = ga100_mc_device_enabled,
.enable = ga100_mc_device_enable,
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists