[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fefcfd9-5783-3f83-da30-c14196958c0b@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 14:47:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: rcar: drop of_match_ptr for ID table
On 12/03/2023 14:46, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:37:34PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The driver can match only via the DT table so the table should be always
>> used and the of_match_ptr does not have any sense (this also allows ACPI
>> matching via PRP0001, even though it might not be relevant here).
>>
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-rcar.c:252:34: error: ‘rcar_pwm_of_table’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
>
> The commit log text sounds like a harmless optimisation, but the error
> message here either means you're fixing a compile failure, or (and?) the
> patch was sent out before the commit log was finalized.
>
> Looking at it this is the error message that triggers if you compile
> this driver with OF unset. I'd like to have that mentioned, then the
> patch looks fine. Ditto for the 2nd patch in this series.
Sure, ack!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists