lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:49:17 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        timestamp@...ts.linux.dev, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        brgl@...ev.pl, corbet@....net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] hte: Add Tegra234 provider

On 10/03/2023 20:06, Dipen Patel wrote:
> This patch adds HTE provider support for the Tegra234 and reflects the
> changes made in the device tree as follow.
> - Add slices field in the SoC specific structure
> - Remove gpio chip find by name function instead make use of the phandle
> parsed from the DT node
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@...dia.com>

(...)

>  	hte_dev->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>  	if (IS_ERR(hte_dev->regs))
>  		return PTR_ERR(hte_dev->regs);
> @@ -635,8 +750,15 @@ static int tegra_hte_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  		gc->match_from_linedata = tegra_hte_match_from_linedata;
>  
> -		hte_dev->c = gpiochip_find("tegra194-gpio-aon",
> -					   tegra_get_gpiochip_from_name);
> +		gpio_ctrl = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node,
> +					     "nvidia,gpio-controller", 0);
> +		if (!gpio_ctrl) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "gpio controller node not found\n");
> +			return -ENODEV;

This is non-bisectable patchset. Remember that DTS cannot go with the
code, thus your code should handle existing DTS (which is BTW already
released with v6.2).

Any remarks to comments that no ABI was broken back then in 2022 are not
valid now. They were valid that time, but sorry, the time passed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ