[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230312165100.45de0c9b@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 16:51:00 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Zhigang Shi <Zhigang.Shi@...eon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:52:57 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:17:15AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > Some light sensors can adjust both the HW-gain and integration time.
> > There are cases where adjusting the integration time has similar impact
> > to the scale of the reported values as gain setting has.
> >
> > IIO users do typically expect to handle scale by a single writable 'scale'
> > entry. Driver should then adjust the gain/time accordingly.
> >
> > It however is difficult for a driver to know whether it should change
> > gain or integration time to meet the requested scale. Usually it is
> > preferred to have longer integration time which usually improves
> > accuracy, but there may be use-cases where long measurement times can be
> > an issue. Thus it can be preferable to allow also changing the
> > integration time - but mitigate the scale impact by also changing the gain
> > underneath. Eg, if integration time change doubles the measured values,
> > the driver can reduce the HW-gain to half.
> >
> > The theory of the computations of gain-time-scale is simple. However,
> > some people (undersigned) got that implemented wrong for more than once.
> >
> > Add some gain-time-scale helpers in order to not dublicate errors in all
> > drivers needing these computations.
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
>
> If it's deliberately not a kernel doc, why to bother to have it looking as one?
> It's really a provocative to some people who will come with a patches to "fix"
> this...
Just make it kernel-doc.
>
> > + * iio_gts_get_gain - Convert scale to total gain
> > + *
> > + * Internal helper for converting scale to total gain.
> > + *
> > + * @max: Maximum linearized scale. As an example, when scale is created
> > + * in magnitude of NANOs and max scale is 64.1 - The linearized
> > + * scale is 64 100 000 000.
> > + * @scale: Linearized scale to compte the gain for.
> > + *
> > + * Return: (floored) gain corresponding to the scale. -EINVAL if scale
> > + * is invalid.
> > + */
> ...
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale, IIO_GTS_HELPER);
>
> I would say _HELPER part is too much, but fine with me.
Hmm. I think I like the HELPER bit as separates it from being a driver.
Of course I might change my mind after a few sleeps.
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/iio-gts-helper.h
>
> Is it _only_ for a Light type of sensors?
I'd move it up a directory and allow for other users.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists