| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230312202424.1495439-3-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 21:24:24 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: lan966x: Stop using packing library
When a frame is injected from CPU, it is required to create an IFH(Inter
frame header) which sits in front of the frame that is transmitted.
This IFH, contains different fields like destination port, to bypass the
analyzer, priotity, etc. Lan966x it is using packing library to set and
get the fields of this IFH. But this seems to be an expensive
operations.
If this is changed with a simpler implementation, the RX will be
improved with ~5Mbit while on the TX is a much bigger improvement as it
is required to set more fields. Below are the numbers for TX.
Before:
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 439 MBytes 367 Mbits/sec 0 sender
After:
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 563 MBytes 472 Mbits/sec 0 sender
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig | 1 -
.../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c | 75 +++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig
index 8bcd60f17d6d3..571e6d4da1e9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/Kconfig
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ config LAN966X_SWITCH
depends on NET_SWITCHDEV
depends on BRIDGE || BRIDGE=n
select PHYLINK
- select PACKING
select PAGE_POOL
select VCAP
help
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 4584a78c6ecbd..9134716b62a55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
#include <linux/ip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/of_net.h>
-#include <linux/packing.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
#include <net/addrconf.h>
@@ -305,46 +304,58 @@ static int lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
+static void lan966x_ifh_set(u8 *ifh, size_t val, size_t pos, size_t length)
+{
+ u32 v = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < length ; i++) {
+ int j = pos + i;
+ int k = j % 8;
+
+ if (i == 0 || k == 0)
+ v = ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1];
+
+ if (val & (1 << i))
+ v |= (1 << k);
+
+ if (i == (length - 1) || k == 7)
+ ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1] = v;
+ }
+}
+
void lan966x_ifh_set_bypass(void *ifh, u64 bypass)
{
- packing(ifh, &bypass, IFH_POS_BYPASS + IFH_WID_BYPASS - 1,
- IFH_POS_BYPASS, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, bypass, IFH_POS_BYPASS, IFH_WID_BYPASS);
}
-void lan966x_ifh_set_port(void *ifh, u64 bypass)
+void lan966x_ifh_set_port(void *ifh, u64 port)
{
- packing(ifh, &bypass, IFH_POS_DSTS + IFH_WID_DSTS - 1,
- IFH_POS_DSTS, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, port, IFH_POS_DSTS, IFH_WID_DSTS);
}
-static void lan966x_ifh_set_qos_class(void *ifh, u64 bypass)
+static void lan966x_ifh_set_qos_class(void *ifh, u64 qos)
{
- packing(ifh, &bypass, IFH_POS_QOS_CLASS + IFH_WID_QOS_CLASS - 1,
- IFH_POS_QOS_CLASS, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, qos, IFH_POS_QOS_CLASS, IFH_WID_QOS_CLASS);
}
-static void lan966x_ifh_set_ipv(void *ifh, u64 bypass)
+static void lan966x_ifh_set_ipv(void *ifh, u64 ipv)
{
- packing(ifh, &bypass, IFH_POS_IPV + IFH_WID_IPV - 1,
- IFH_POS_IPV, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, ipv, IFH_POS_IPV, IFH_WID_IPV);
}
static void lan966x_ifh_set_vid(void *ifh, u64 vid)
{
- packing(ifh, &vid, IFH_POS_TCI + IFH_WID_TCI - 1,
- IFH_POS_TCI, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, vid, IFH_POS_TCI, IFH_WID_TCI);
}
static void lan966x_ifh_set_rew_op(void *ifh, u64 rew_op)
{
- packing(ifh, &rew_op, IFH_POS_REW_CMD + IFH_WID_REW_CMD - 1,
- IFH_POS_REW_CMD, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, rew_op, IFH_POS_REW_CMD, IFH_WID_REW_CMD);
}
static void lan966x_ifh_set_timestamp(void *ifh, u64 timestamp)
{
- packing(ifh, ×tamp, IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP + IFH_WID_TIMESTAMP - 1,
- IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_LEN * 4, PACK, 0);
+ lan966x_ifh_set(ifh, timestamp, IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_WID_TIMESTAMP);
}
static netdev_tx_t lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -582,22 +593,38 @@ static int lan966x_rx_frame_word(struct lan966x *lan966x, u8 grp, u32 *rval)
}
}
+static u64 lan966x_ifh_get(u8 *ifh, size_t pos, size_t length)
+{
+ u64 val = 0;
+ u8 v;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < length ; i++) {
+ int j = pos + i;
+ int k = j % 8;
+
+ if (i == 0 || k == 0)
+ v = ifh[IFH_LEN_BYTES - (j / 8) - 1];
+
+ if (v & (1 << k))
+ val |= (1 << i);
+ }
+
+ return val;
+}
+
void lan966x_ifh_get_src_port(void *ifh, u64 *src_port)
{
- packing(ifh, src_port, IFH_POS_SRCPORT + IFH_WID_SRCPORT - 1,
- IFH_POS_SRCPORT, IFH_LEN * 4, UNPACK, 0);
+ *src_port = lan966x_ifh_get(ifh, IFH_POS_SRCPORT, IFH_WID_SRCPORT);
}
static void lan966x_ifh_get_len(void *ifh, u64 *len)
{
- packing(ifh, len, IFH_POS_LEN + IFH_WID_LEN - 1,
- IFH_POS_LEN, IFH_LEN * 4, UNPACK, 0);
+ *len = lan966x_ifh_get(ifh, IFH_POS_LEN, IFH_WID_LEN);
}
void lan966x_ifh_get_timestamp(void *ifh, u64 *timestamp)
{
- packing(ifh, timestamp, IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP + IFH_WID_TIMESTAMP - 1,
- IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_LEN * 4, UNPACK, 0);
+ *timestamp = lan966x_ifh_get(ifh, IFH_POS_TIMESTAMP, IFH_WID_TIMESTAMP);
}
static irqreturn_t lan966x_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *args)
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists