[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230312204150.1353517-12-robdclark@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:41:39 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] soc: qcom: smd-rpm: Use GFP_ATOMIC in write path
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Preparing for better lockdep annotations for things that happen in runpm
suspend/resume path vs shrinker/reclaim in the following patches, we
need to avoid allocations that can trigger reclaim in the icc_set_bw()
path. In the RPMh case, rpmh_write_batch() already uses GFP_ATOMIC, so
it should be reasonable to use in the smd-rpm case as well.
Alternatively, 256bytes is small enough for a function that isn't called
recursively to allocate on-stack.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
index 7e3b6a7ea34c..478da981d9fb 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ int qcom_rpm_smd_write(struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm,
if (WARN_ON(size >= 256))
return -EINVAL;
- pkt = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pkt = kmalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!pkt)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists