[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230312135007.05a4fcea4d26c698a5d48b43@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:50:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: correct HWPOISON_INJECT config
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:38:43 +0800 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
> Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT) to check whether or not to
> enable HWPoison injector module.
This is quite clear from the patch itself. What is unclear is "why".
Does it fix a build error? If so, please describe and add a Fixes: if
appropriate. Is it just a cleanup? etcetera.
Thanks.
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static bool page_handle_poison(struct page *page, bool hugepage_or_freepage, boo
> return true;
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT) || defined(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT_MODULE)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWPOISON_INJECT)
>
> u32 hwpoison_filter_enable = 0;
> u32 hwpoison_filter_dev_major = ~0U;
> --
> 2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists