[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230313182730.cx4n7lvhbtcs4hpn@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:27:30 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: expand clk_ignore_unused mechanism to keep only
a few clks on
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 05:18:12PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Allow to pass an integer n that results in only keeping n unused clocks
> enabled.
>
> This helps to debug the problem if you only know that clk_ignore_unused
> helps but you have no clue yet which clock is the culprit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> compared to v2 sent in August 2021 this is a trivial rebase on top of
> v6.1-rc1. I pinged that one repeatedly, I'm now trying with resending
> and calling the rebased patch v3 to maybe get some feedback. :-\
I didn't get any feedback on this patch and still consider it useful.
Any insights from your side?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists