linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] clk: expand clk_ignore_unused mechanism to keep only a few clks on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:27:30 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: expand clk_ignore_unused mechanism to keep only
 a few clks on

Hello,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 05:18:12PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Allow to pass an integer n that results in only keeping n unused clocks
> enabled.
> 
> This helps to debug the problem if you only know that clk_ignore_unused
> helps but you have no clue yet which clock is the culprit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> compared to v2 sent in August 2021 this is a trivial rebase on top of
> v6.1-rc1. I pinged that one repeatedly, I'm now trying with resending
> and calling the rebased patch v3 to maybe get some feedback. :-\

I didn't get any feedback on this patch and still consider it useful.

Any insights from your side?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)