linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] qede: remove linux/version.h and linux/compiler.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230313114538.74e6caca@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:45:38 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
        Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qede: remove linux/version.h and linux/compiler.h

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:46:57 +0300 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This is only for networking.
> 
> It affect BPF too, I suppose, but I always tell everyone to just send
> BPF bug reports instead of patches.  I can keep track of linux-next, net
> and net-next.  No one can keep track of all @#$@#$@#$@# 300+ trees.
> 
> I really hate this networking requirement but I try really hard to get
> it right and still mess up half the time.

Don't worry about it too much, there needs to be a level of
understanding for cross-tree folks. This unfortunately may 
not be afforded to less known developers.. because we don't 
know them/that they are working cross-tree.

Reality check for me - this is really something that should
be handled by our process scripts, right? get_maintainer/
/checkpatch ? Or that's not a fair expectation.