lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:07:52 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regmap: cache: Return error in cache sync
 operations for REGCACHE_NONE

On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:18:11 +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> There is no sense in doing a cache sync on REGCACHE_NONE regmaps.
> Instead of panicking the kernel due to missing cache_ops, return an error
> to client driver.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] regmap: cache: Return error in cache sync operations for REGCACHE_NONE
      commit: fd883d79e4dcd2417c2b80756f22a2ff03b0f6e0
[2/2] regmap: cache: Fix return value
      commit: 24d80fde40c995b2e2faaf72034e12e60a416630

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ