linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ba225af5-3729-32a4-318a-c1c4b8e8b37a@igalia.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:18:48 -0300
From:   "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To:     linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
        Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
        kernel@...ccoli.net, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] alpha: Clean-up the panic notifier code

On 20/02/2023 18:22, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following
> the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the
> machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which
> doesn't seem to be a good idea.
> 
> So, let's clean the code and set the notifier to run as the
> latest, following the same approach other architectures are
> doing - also, remove the unnecessary include of a header already
> included indirectly.
> 
> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> 
> V4:
> - Rebased (and build-tested) against v6.2.
> 
> V3:
> - No changes.
> 
> V2:
> - Fixed rth email address;
> - Added Petr's review tag - thanks!
> 

Hi folks, just a gentle ping.
Lemme know if there's anything I could do in order to get this move forward.

Thanks in advance,


Guilherme