[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eaa72600-b85a-fa97-45ff-6412696682b6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:49:41 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 06/11] power: supply: generic-adc-battery: drop charge
now support
Hi dee Ho all,
On 3/10/23 10:29, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 11:50 PM Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Drop CHARGE_NOW support, which requires a platform specific
>> calculation method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
>
> I agree. If we want to support this, we should use the generic
> methods with interpolation tables defined in DT as well, and it also
> ideally requires load compensated resistance calculation to figure
> out Ri so this can bring any kind of reasonable precision.
I guess you have your reasons, besides you have far better insight to
things than I do - hence I am not really objecting this - just asking a
question ;)
Do we have generic facilities of computing this based on the DT tables /
Ri in place(?) I guess that we do need/see platform specific
implementations as long as there is no generic "de-facto" way of doing
this available...
Well, maybe this helps kicking things to that direction :)
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
-- Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists