[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <834fb899-7a03-ba0a-8302-f64ea58c60dd@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:51:20 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ive.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/21] dt-bindings: clock: Add StarFive JH7110 system
clock and reset generator
On 13/03/2023 03:47, Hal Feng wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:17:00 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 17:07:23 +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
>>> From: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
>>>
>>> Add bindings for the system clock and reset generator (SYSCRG) on the
>>> JH7110 RISC-V SoC by StarFive Ltd.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml | 104 +++++++++
>>> MAINTAINERS | 8 +-
>>> .../dt-bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-crg.h | 203 ++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../dt-bindings/reset/starfive,jh7110-crg.h | 142 ++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 454 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-syscrg.yaml
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/starfive,jh7110-crg.h
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/starfive,jh7110-crg.h
>>>
>>
>>
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>
>> Missing tags:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> This patch has been changed a lot and I am not sure whether it's still
> the one you want. So I removed the Reviewed-by tag.
Then mention it in changelog, just like Rob asked:
"If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed."
I don't see any explanation in the changelog about it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists