linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] bonding: Fix warning in default_device_exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZA7uTL2/IkBEIRD7@kernel-devel>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:35:08 +0900
From:   Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc:     j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        syzbot+9dfc3f3348729cc82277@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: Fix warning in default_device_exit_batch()

Hi Nik,

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 10:58:18PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 12/03/2023 17:21, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> > syzbot reported warning in default_device_exit_batch() like below [1]:
> > 
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 56 at net/core/dev.c:10867 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x14cf/0x19f0 net/core/dev.c:10867
> > ...
> > Call Trace:
> >  <TASK>
> >  unregister_netdevice_many net/core/dev.c:10897 [inline]
> >  default_device_exit_batch+0x451/0x5b0 net/core/dev.c:11350
> >  ops_exit_list+0x125/0x170 net/core/net_namespace.c:174
> >  cleanup_net+0x4ee/0xb10 net/core/net_namespace.c:613
> >  process_one_work+0x9bf/0x1820 kernel/workqueue.c:2390
> >  worker_thread+0x669/0x1090 kernel/workqueue.c:2537
> >  kthread+0x2e8/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
> >  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
> >  </TASK>
> > 
> > For bond devices which also has a master device, IFF_SLAVE flag is
> > cleared at err_undo_flags label in bond_enslave() if it is not
> > ARPHRD_ETHER type.  In this case, __bond_release_one() is not called
> > when bond_netdev_event() received NETDEV_UNREGISTER event.  This
> > causes the above warning.
> > 
> > This patch fixes this issue by setting IFF_SLAVE flag at
> > err_undo_flags label in bond_enslave() if the bond device has a master
> > device.
> > 
> 
> The proper way is to check if the bond device had the IFF_SLAVE flag before the
> ether_setup() call which clears it, and restore it after.
> 
> > Fixes: 7d5cd2ce5292 ("bonding: correctly handle bonding type change on enslave failure")
> > Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=391c7b1f6522182899efba27d891f1743e8eb3ef [1]
> > Reported-by: syzbot+9dfc3f3348729cc82277@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 ++
> >  include/net/bonding.h           | 5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > index 00646aa315c3..1a8b59e1468d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -2291,6 +2291,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev,
> >  			dev_close(bond_dev);
> >  			ether_setup(bond_dev);
> >  			bond_dev->flags |= IFF_MASTER;
> > +			if (bond_has_master(bond))
> > +				bond_dev->flags |= IFF_SLAVE;
> >  			bond_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_TX_SKB_SHARING;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
> > index ea36ab7f9e72..ed0b49501fad 100644
> > --- a/include/net/bonding.h
> > +++ b/include/net/bonding.h
> > @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@
> >  
> >  #define bond_has_slaves(bond) !list_empty(bond_slave_list(bond))
> >  
> > +/* master list primitives */
> > +#define bond_master_list(bond) (&(bond)->dev->adj_list.upper)
> > +
> > +#define bond_has_master(bond) !list_empty(bond_master_list(bond))
> > +
> 
> This is not the proper way to check for a master device.
> 
> >  /* IMPORTANT: bond_first/last_slave can return NULL in case of an empty list */
> >  #define bond_first_slave(bond) \
> >  	(bond_has_slaves(bond) ? \
> 
> The device flags are wrong because of ether_setup() which clears IFF_SLAVE, we should
> just check if it was present before and restore it after the ether_setup() call.

Thank you so much for your comment!  I understand your point, and
agree that your approach must resolve the issue.

BTW, do you mean there is a case where a device has IFF_SLAVE flag but
the upper list is empty?  I thought a device with IFF_SLAVE flag has a
master device in the upper list (that is why I took the above way.)

Thanks,
Shigeru

> 
> I'll send a fix tomorrow after testing it.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Nik
>