[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77564d46-5bca-81b8-8e14-c70624ddce5e@ghiti.fr>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:01:33 +0100
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] arm64: Make use of memblock_isolate_memory for the
linear mapping
Hi Andrew,
On 3/13/23 10:43, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:45:38AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>> In order to isolate the kernel text mapping, we used some sort of hack
>> to isolate the kernel text range which consisted in marking this region
>> as not mappable with memblock_mark_nomap. Simply use the newly introduced
>> memblock_isolate_memory function which does exactly the same but does not
>> uselessly mark the region as not mappable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 6f9d8898a025..408dc852805c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>> * So temporarily mark them as NOMAP to skip mappings in
>> * the following for-loop
>> */
> The comment above doesn't apply anymore.
Yep, noticed this one after sending, thanks anyway!
>
>> - memblock_mark_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
>> + memblock_isolate_memory(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>> if (crash_mem_map) {
>> @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>> for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
>> if (start >= end)
>> break;
>> +
> Mark nomap is also used for the crash kernel. Does the new API not work
> for it?
Seems you're right, I missed it.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
>> /*
>> * The linear map must allow allocation tags reading/writing
>> * if MTE is present. Otherwise, it has the same attributes as
>> @@ -589,7 +590,6 @@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp)
>> */
>> __map_memblock(pgdp, kernel_start, kernel_end,
>> PAGE_KERNEL, NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
>> - memblock_clear_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
>>
>> /*
>> * Use page-level mappings here so that we can shrink the region
>> --
>> 2.37.2
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists