[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYQOb8dDfyYspLE974k97ZsUH+YKk_AQJbjCpVJXP5txQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:20:05 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>, Phu Luu An <phu.luuan@....com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <Ghennadi.Procopciuc@....nxp.com>,
Stefan-Gabriel Mirea <stefan-gabriel.mirea@....com>,
Andrei Stefanescu <andrei.stefanescu@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>,
Matthew Nunez <matthew.nunez@....com>,
Radu Pirea <radu-nicolae.pirea@....com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@....com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: s32cc: fix !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP build error
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:02 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> The declaration of s32_pinctrl_suspend/s32_pinctrl_resume is hidden
> in an #ifdef, causing a compilation failure when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is
> disabled:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/nxp/pinctrl-s32g2.c:754:38: error: 's32_pinctrl_suspend' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 's32_pinctrl_probe'?
> drivers/pinctrl/nxp/pinctrl-s32g2.c:754:9: note: in expansion of macro 'SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS'
> 754 | SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(s32_pinctrl_suspend,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove the bogus #ifdef and __maybe_unused annation on the global
> functions, and instead use the proper LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS()
> macro to pick set the function pointer.
>
> As the function definition is still in the #ifdef block, this leads
> to the correct code in all configurations.
>
> Fixes: fd84aaa8173d ("pinctrl: add NXP S32 SoC family support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists