[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26a291d8-49c0-e5af-846b-1e29f8266ba9@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:29:24 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, masahiroy@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] menuconfig: reclaim horizontal space
Hi,
On 3/11/23 03:42, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Draw the menu box from position (0, 2) so that there is less unused
> space available. Horizontal is not _really_ important but on small
> terminals maybe it is.
ISTM that the first sentence goes with patch 3/3. ??
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> ---
> scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/menubox.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/menubox.c b/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/menubox.c
> index 5c3addad89b0..5eb67c04821f 100644
> --- a/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/menubox.c
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/menubox.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ int dialog_menu(const char *title, const char *prompt,
> return -ERRDISPLAYTOOSMALL;
>
> height -= 4;
> - width -= 5;
How does this work? In my test patch, I changed 5 to 4 to recover/reclaim the
shadow line. To my surprise, I don't see any negative issue with this change,
but I am perplexed by it.
Anyway, it worked in my testing.
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> menu_height = height - 10;
>
> max_choice = MIN(menu_height, item_count());
Thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists