[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZA8Z08U1sMOhc+V5@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:40:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
Zhigang Shi <Zhigang.Shi@...eon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 05:08:48PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:06:38 +0000
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 11:17:15 +0200
> > Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > Given most modern IIO drivers use fully devm_ based probing, for now I would not
> > expose anything else. That will reduce the interface a lot which I think
> > is probably a good thing at this stage.
> >
> > Keep the non devm stuff internally though as it is a nice structure to have
> > an I can see we may want some of these in non devm form in the future.
> >
> > Similarly - for now don't expose the individual table building functions
> > as we may never need them in drivers. We (more or less) only support interfaces
> > that are used and so far they aren't.
> >
> > For other functions it's worth thinking about whether to not export them
> > initially. I haven't been through them all to figure out what is not currently used.
> >
> Ah. I forgot the tests that don't have a device so can't use devm.
Why not? I have seen, IIRC, test cases inside the kernel that fakes the device
for that.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists