[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJedcCwgvo3meC=k_nPYrRzEj7Hzcy8kqrvHqHLvmPWLjCq_3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:01:21 +0800
From: Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>, ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net,
asmadeus@...ewreck.org, linux_oss@...debyte.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
1395428693sheep@...il.com, alex000young@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] 9p/xen : Fix use after free bug in
xen_9pfs_front_remove due to race condition
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com> 于2023年3月13日周一 21:54写道:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:00:02PM +0800, Zheng Wang wrote:
> > In xen_9pfs_front_probe, it calls xen_9pfs_front_alloc_dataring
> > to init priv->rings and bound &ring->work with p9_xen_response.
> >
> > When it calls xen_9pfs_front_event_handler to handle IRQ requests,
> > it will finally call schedule_work to start the work.
> >
> > When we call xen_9pfs_front_remove to remove the driver, there
> > may be a sequence as follows:
> >
> > Fix it by finishing the work before cleanup in xen_9pfs_front_free.
> >
> > Note that, this bug is found by static analysis, which might be
> > false positive.
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> >
> > |p9_xen_response
> > xen_9pfs_front_remove|
> > xen_9pfs_front_free|
> > kfree(priv) |
> > //free priv |
> > |p9_tag_lookup
> > |//use priv->client
> >
> > Fixes: 71ebd71921e4 ("xen/9pfs: connect to the backend")
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - fix type error of ring found by kernel test robot
> > ---
> > net/9p/trans_xen.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > index c64050e839ac..83764431c066 100644
> > --- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > +++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
> > @@ -274,12 +274,17 @@ static const struct xenbus_device_id xen_9pfs_front_ids[] = {
> > static void xen_9pfs_front_free(struct xen_9pfs_front_priv *priv)
> > {
> > int i, j;
> > + struct xen_9pfs_dataring *ring = NULL;
> Move it before int i, j to have RCT.
>
> >
> > write_lock(&xen_9pfs_lock);
> > list_del(&priv->list);
> > write_unlock(&xen_9pfs_lock);
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rings; i++) {
> > + /*cancel work*/
> It isn't needed I think, the function cancel_work_sync() tells everything
> here.
>
Get it, will remove it in the next version of patch.
Best regards,
Zheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists