lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfe08af3-d89b-9052-42c8-dd0529c16b3d@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:02:20 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
CC:     <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>, <jgq516@...il.com>, <neilb@...e.de>,
        <shli@...com>, <lzhong@...e.com>, <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <yangerkun@...wei.com>, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] md/raid10: several simple obvious bugfix

Hi, Song!

在 2023/03/14 6:37, Song Liu 写道:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 11:39 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> We're running many tests for raid10 currently, and we found a lot of
>> problems already. This patchset is the first part for some simple and
>> obvious problems. Most of the patches were sent separately already, but
>> I think a patchset is better for review.
>>

We had many testcase for raid10 locally,just consulte that is mdadm the
only place to push some new tests? We're maintaining tests through
blktests, is't ok if we push those tests to blktests?

Thanks,
Kuai

>> Yu Kuai (6):
>>    md/raid10: don't call bio_start_io_acct twice for bio which
>>      experienced read error
>>    md: fix soft lockup in status_resync
>>    md/raid10: don't BUG_ON() in raise_barrier()
>>    md/radi10: fix leak of 'r10bio->remaining' for recovery
>>    md/raid10: fix memleak for 'conf->bio_split'
>>    md/raid10: fix memleak of md thread
> 
> Applied 2/6 to 6/6 to md-next. Thanks!
> 
> Song
> 
>>
>>   drivers/md/md.c     | 18 +++++------
>>   drivers/md/raid10.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>   2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ