[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230314142831.75ste5im66rx4mt3@quack3>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:28:31 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.com, tudor.ambarus@...aro.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ext4: Fix reusing stale buffer heads from last
failed mounting
On Tue 14-03-23 20:31:43, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> > On Tue 14-03-23 20:01:46, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> > > 在 2023/3/14 19:33, Jan Kara 写道:
> > > Hi Jan,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -1271,14 +1277,8 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> > > > > sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev);
> > > > > invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
> > >
> > > For journal in the inode case, journal bhs come from block device, which
> > > means buffers will be dropped after this line 'invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev)'
> > > being executed.
> >
> > Right, I've missed that. But then why do you remove the sbi->s_journal_bdev
> > != sb->s_bdev condition below?
> >
>
> I think 'sbi->s_journal_bdev != sb->s_bdev' always becomes true if
> sbi->s_journal_bdev exists.
OK, fair point. But please move this cleanup into a separate commit with
this justification. Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists