lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:20:03 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:25 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<philmd@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 10/3/23 15:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >   arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c | 2 +-
> >   arch/mips/pci/pci-rt3883.c | 2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
> > index d967e4c0cf24..79e29bf42a24 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-lantiq.c
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int ltq_pci_startup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> >       /* and enable the clocks */
> >       clk_enable(clk_pci);
> > -     if (of_find_property(node, "lantiq,external-clock", NULL))
> > +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "lantiq,external-clock"))
>
> Just curious, is this property correct?

Shrug. I can only tell from how it is used here and because we have
other similar properties used to select a clock.

> I can't find it and wonder if
> this is dead code (always disabling the clock)... I'm probably missing
> something obvious :/

If you don't use the external clock, then you disable it. Seems sensible to me.

>
> >               clk_enable(clk_external);
> >       else
> >               clk_disable(clk_external);
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ