linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] serial: core: Start managing serial controllers to enable runtime PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:38:35 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] serial: core: Start managing serial controllers
 to enable runtime PM

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:38:10PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> [230314 13:25]:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 09:35:59AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:

...

> > > +	/* Increment the runtime PM usage count for the active check below */
> > > +	err = pm_runtime_get(port_dev);
> > 
> > The question here is why don't we need to actually turn on the device immediately
> > (sync) if it's not already powered?

> Doing it would require the use of pm_runtime_irq_safe() at least currently.

> > > +	if (err < 0) {
> > > +		pm_runtime_put_noidle(port_dev);
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Start TX if enabled, and kick runtime PM. Otherwise we must
> > > +	 * wait for a retry. See also serial_port.c for runtime PM
> > > +	 * autosuspend timeout.
> > > +	 */
> > 
> > I.o.w. does the start_tx() require device to be powered on at this point?
> 
> Yes. And if the device is not enabled, serial_port.c runtime_resume()
> calls this function again after the hardware is enabled.

Ah, that makes sense.

> > > +	if (pm_runtime_active(port_dev))
> > >  		port->ops->start_tx(port);
> > > +	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(port_dev);
> > > +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(port_dev);
> 
> For your other comments, I'll take a look thanks.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko