lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:52:23 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....nxp.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul.olaru@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-compress: Inherit atomicity from DAI link for
 Compress FE



On 3/14/23 11:37, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:14 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart
> <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/14/23 10:34, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
>>>
>>> After commit bbf7d3b1c4f40 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: align BE 'atomicity' with
>>> that of the FE") BE and FE atomicity must match.
>>>
>>> In the case of Compress PCM there is a mismatch in atomicity between FE
>>> and BE and we get errors like this:
>>>
>>> [   36.434566]  sai1-wm8960-hifi: dpcm_be_connect: FE is atomic but BE
>>> is nonatomic, invalid configuration
>>
>> Not clear on the 'FE is atomic' in the case of a compressed stream,
>> which has to be handled with some sort of IPC, i.e. be nonatomic.
>>
> 
> 'FE is atomic' in this message is printed because this is the default value
> of nonatomic field when PCM struct associated for a Compress PCM
> struct is allocated.
> 
> No one changes 'nonatomic' field for Compress FE until my current patch.
> 
>> Also not sure why the FE is not set as nonatomic by the SOF parts?
>> If it's needed for PCM, why wouldn't it be needed for compressed data?
> 
> FE is not touched for SOF parts. Only BE is set to nonatomic by SOF.

Where do you see the BE being changed by SOF?

> 
> See: sound/soc/topology.c
> 
> »       /* Set nonatomic property for FE dai links as their trigger
> action involves IPC's */
> »       if (!link->no_pcm) {
> »       »       link->nonatomic = true;
> »       »       return 0;
> »       }

that's a FE property, not BE.

> FE for PCM is modified by sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> 
> int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
> »       pcm->nonatomic = rtd->dai_link->nonatomic;
> 
> So, I guess people assumed that is enough to use RTD dai link to set
> pcm->noatomic field
> and didn't look at it in SOF.

Ah yes, now I see your point now. You still had a logical inversion
above but you're correct here.

> When FE for Compress PCM is created, we don't use soc_new_pcm but instead
> we use snd_pcm_new_internal which doesn't inherit the nonatomic field
> of the rtd->dai_link
> as Normal PCM does inside soc_pcm_new.
> 
> So, my patch makes sure we inherit the nonatomic field from
> rtd->dai_link also for Compress PCM
> similar with what already happens for Normal PCM.
> 
> tl;dr: when creating a Normal PCM pcm->nonatomic is inherited from RTD
> DAI link. when creating a
> Compress PCM pcm->nonatomic field is not set. This patch makes sure
> that for Compres PCM
> we also inherit nonatomic from RTD DAI link.

That makes sense. It's quite likely that the compress PCM should be
nonatomic by default, not sure how it can work otherwise.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ