[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBCuSCIRrtdQQTeM@sashalap>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:26:32 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, cohuck@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 05/16] s390/virtio: sort out physical vs
virtual pointers usage
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:26:40AM +0100, Nico Boehr wrote:
>Hi Sasha, s390 maintainers,
>
>Quoting Sasha Levin (2023-03-05 14:51:56)
>> From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 5fc5b94a273655128159186c87662105db8afeb5 ]
>>
>> This does not fix a real bug, since virtual addresses
>> are currently indentical to physical ones.
>
>not sure if it is appropriate to pick for stable, since it does not fix a bug currently.
>
>Alexander, Janosch, your opinion?
I'll drop it, thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists