linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section "Respond to review comments"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:31:33 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@....com>
Cc:     linux@...mhuis.info, lengxujun2007@....com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: process: submitting-patches: fix typo in section
 "Respond to review comments"

Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@....com> writes:

> In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is
> a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against".
>
> Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time.  Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
>  reviewers sometimes get grumpy.  Even in that case, though, respond
>  politely and address the problems they have pointed out.  When sending a next
>  version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
> -explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
> +explaining difference against previous submission (see
>  :ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).

Applied, thanks.

jon