lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:28:23 +0800
From:   richard clark <richard.xnu.clark@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Question about select and poll system call

Hi, (Sorry, not find the maintainers for this subsystem, so to the lkml)

There're two questions about these system calls:
1. According to https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/select.html:
ERRORS
[EINVAL]
      The nfds argument is less than 0 or greater than FD_SETSIZE.
But the current implementation in Linux like:
       if (nfds > FD_SETSIZE)
               nfds = FD_SETSIZE
What's the rationale behind this?

2. Can we unify the two different system calls? For example, using
poll(...) to implement the frontend select call(...), is there
something I'm missing for current implementation? The Cons and Pros,
etc

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ