linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: sunxi: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13221354.uLZWGnKmhe@jernej-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:00:38 +0100
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: sunxi: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property
 presence

Dne petek, 10. marec 2023 ob 15:47:24 CET je Rob Herring napisal(a):
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>

Best regards,
Jernej

> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c
> index d90e4a264b6f..1734da357ca2 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_mbus.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int sunxi_mbus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  	 * Older DTs or SoCs who are not clearly understood need to set
>  	 * that DMA offset though.
>  	 */
> -	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "interconnects", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "interconnects"))
>  		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> 
>  	ret = dma_direct_set_offset(dev, PHYS_OFFSET, 0, SZ_4G);