lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3218406.aeNJFYEL58@jernej-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:01:59 +0100
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property
 presence

Dne petek, 10. marec 2023 ob 15:47:20 CET je Rob Herring napisal(a):
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c         |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c          |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c        |  4 ++--
>  drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c    | 20 ++++++++++----------

For sunxi:
Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>

Best regards,
Jernej

>  6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c index 007b98ce5631..8649a2f9d324
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-moore.c
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int mtk_build_gpiochip(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw)
>  	 * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to
>  	 * bind pinctrl and gpio drivers via the "gpio-ranges" property.
>  	 */
> -	if (!of_find_property(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(hw->dev->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip, dev_name(hw->dev), 
0, 0,
>  					     chip->ngpio);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 190923757cda..0dabbcf68b9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -939,11 +939,11 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs,
> struct device_node *np,
> 
>  	/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop2[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
> +		if (of_property_present(np, prop4[i].name))
>  			nconfs++;
>  	}
>  	if (!nconfs)
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c index 1181c4b506b1..3c031692e44d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
> 
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "gpio-ranges")) {
>  		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges 
property\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c index b74147800319..5c71e168b370 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int sh_pfc_dt_subnode_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev
> *pctldev, * inside a subnode nor across subnodes.
>  	 */
>  	if (!pmx->func_prop_name) {
> -		if (of_find_property(np, "groups", NULL) ||
> -		    of_find_property(np, "pins", NULL)) {
> +		if (of_property_present(np, "groups")||
> +		    of_property_present(np, "pins")) {
>  			pmx->func_prop_name = "function";
>  			pmx->groups_prop_name = "groups";
>  			pmx->pins_prop_name = "pins";
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c index cb33a23ab0c1..66a25becd8f5
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1374,7 +1374,7 @@ static struct irq_domain
> *stm32_pctrl_get_irq_domain(struct platform_device *pde struct device_node
> *parent;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
> 
> -	if (!of_find_property(np, "interrupt-parent", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(np, "interrupt-parent"))
>  		return NULL;
> 
>  	parent = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index f35179eceb4e..1dc1882cbdd7
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -224,16 +224,16 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_get_group_pins(struct
> pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> 
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,pull", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "bias-disable") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,pull");
>  }
> 
>  static bool sunxi_pctrl_has_drive_prop(struct device_node *node)
>  {
> -	return of_find_property(node, "drive-strength", NULL) ||
> -		of_find_property(node, "allwinner,drive", NULL);
> +	return of_property_present(node, "drive-strength") ||
> +		of_property_present(node, "allwinner,drive");
>  }
> 
>  static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct device_node *node)
> @@ -241,13 +241,13 @@ static int sunxi_pctrl_parse_bias_prop(struct
> device_node *node) u32 val;
> 
>  	/* Try the new style binding */
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-up", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-up"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP;
> 
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-pull-down", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-pull-down"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN;
> 
> -	if (of_find_property(node, "bias-disable", NULL))
> +	if (of_property_present(node, "bias-disable"))
>  		return PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE;
> 
>  	/* And fall back to the old binding */
> @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_setup_debounce(struct
> sunxi_pinctrl *pctl, return 0;
> 
>  	/* If we don't have any setup, bail out */
> -	if (!of_find_property(node, "input-debounce", NULL))
> +	if (!of_property_present(node, "input-debounce"))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	losc = devm_clk_get(pctl->dev, "losc");




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ