| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:45:18 +0000
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
To: Elson Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"balbi@...nel.org" <balbi@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"quic_wcheng@...cinc.com" <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
"quic_jackp@...cinc.com" <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] usb: gadget: f_ecm: Add suspend/resume and remote
wakeup support
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, Elson Serrao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/13/2023 1:27 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, Elson Roy Serrao wrote:
> > > > When host sends a suspend notification to the device, handle
> > > > the suspend callbacks in the function driver. Enhanced super
> > > > speed devices can support function suspend feature to put the
> > > > function in suspend state. Handle function suspend callback.
> > > >
> > > > Depending on the remote wakeup capability the device can either
> > > > trigger a remote wakeup or wait for the host initiated resume to
> > > > start data transfer again.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Elson Roy Serrao <quic_eserrao@...cinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_ether.h | 4 +++
> > > > 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > index a7ab30e..d50c1a4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ecm.c
> > > > @@ -633,6 +633,8 @@ static void ecm_disable(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > usb_ep_disable(ecm->notify);
> > > > ecm->notify->desc = NULL;
> > > > + f->func_suspended = false;
> > > > + f->func_wakeup_armed = false;
> > > > }
> > > > /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> > > > @@ -885,6 +887,68 @@ static struct usb_function_instance *ecm_alloc_inst(void)
> > > > return &opts->func_inst;
> > > > }
> > > > +static void ecm_suspend(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
> > > > + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (f->func_suspended) {
> > > > + DBG(cdev, "Function already suspended\n");
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + DBG(cdev, "ECM Suspend\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + gether_suspend(&ecm->port);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void ecm_resume(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
> > > > + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * If the function is in USB3 Function Suspend state, resume is
> > > > + * canceled. In this case resume is done by a Function Resume request.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (f->func_suspended)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + DBG(cdev, "ECM Resume\n");
> > > > +
> > > > + gether_resume(&ecm->port);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ecm_get_status(struct usb_function *f)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return (f->func_wakeup_armed ? USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW : 0) |
> > > > + USB_INTRF_STAT_FUNC_RW_CAP;
> > >
> > > Need to check the usb configuration is if it's wakeup_capable.
> > >
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int ecm_func_suspend(struct usb_function *f, u8 options)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct f_ecm *ecm = func_to_ecm(f);
> > > > + struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = ecm->port.func.config->cdev;
> > > > +
> > > > + DBG(cdev, "func susp %u cmd\n", options);
> > > > +
> > > > + f->func_wakeup_armed = !!(options & (USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_RW >> 8));
> > >
> > > Same here. Check config's bmAttributes if it's remote wakeup capable
> > > before arming for remote wakeup.
> > >
> > Done. I will add that check for above two cases.
> > > > +
> > > > + if (options & (USB_INTRF_FUNC_SUSPEND_LP >> 8)) {
> > > > + if (!f->func_suspended) {
> > > > + ecm_suspend(f);
> > > > + f->func_suspended = true;
> > > > + }
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + if (f->func_suspended) {
> > > > + f->func_suspended = false;
> > > > + ecm_resume(f);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > Need to return negative error if SetFeature fails. We should fix the
> > > composite layer to allow for protocal STALL here. Host needs to know if
> > > it should proceed to put the function in suspend.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thinh
> > >
> >
> > Could you please clarify what SetFeature fail here means? The host puts the
> > function in function suspend state through this SetFeature request.
> > If the device is not configured for remote wakeup (bmAtrributes wakeup bit),
> > like you mentioned above we should not arm the function for remote wakeup.
> > But the host is free to put the function in function suspend state and wake
> > it up through host initiated function resume right?
> >
>
> I mean if we want to tell the host that a feature cannot be set or that
> it doesn't exist, we should respond with a protocol STALL. How the host
> respond to the rejected SetFeature request is up to the host. But we
> should at least let the host know that.
>
> I'm suggesting to remove the setting of value = 0 in composite.c:
>
> -- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
> @@ -2000,7 +2000,6 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
> ERROR(cdev,
> "func_suspend() returned error %d\n",
> value);
> - value = 0;
> }
> break;
> }
>
>
> i.e. we should allow the return value to go through.
>
Also, I imagine there are cases where we don't want the host to put the
device in suspend because it lacks remote wakeup. e.g. a HID device such
as a keyboard (though it's a bit odd to see one without remote wake
capability)
Thanks,
Thinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists