[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <342f6f8a-a6d4-eda0-0a66-05926ce127d0@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:06:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: use fallback for IPQ8074
SoC
On 14/03/2023 05:15, Kathiravan T wrote:
> Since the IPQ8074 mailbox is compatible with the IPQ6018, lets create
> the fallback to ipq6018 compatible, so that we don't bloat the of_device_id
> table in the driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---
Why do you send conflicting patches and take out some pieces of my
patchset into yours?
This was send already 1.5 months ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
NAK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists