linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: use fallback for IPQ8074 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:06:58 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: use fallback for IPQ8074
 SoC

On 14/03/2023 05:15, Kathiravan T wrote:
> Since the IPQ8074 mailbox is compatible with the IPQ6018, lets create
> the fallback to ipq6018 compatible, so that we don't bloat the of_device_id
> table in the driver.
> 
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---

Why do you send conflicting patches and take out some pieces of my
patchset into yours?

This was send already 1.5 months ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

NAK.

Best regards,
Krzysztof