lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:34:43 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, bp@...en8.de,
        tony.luck@...el.com
Cc:     konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, james.morse@....com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, rric@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        quic_ppareek@...cinc.com, luca.weiss@...rphone.com,
        ahalaney@...hat.com, steev@...i.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 14/14] soc: qcom: llcc: Do not create EDAC platform device on SDM845

The platforms based on SDM845 SoC locks the access to EDAC registers in the
bootloader. So probing the EDAC driver will result in a crash. Hence,
disable the creation of EDAC platform device on all SDM845 devices.

The issue has been observed on Lenovo Yoga C630 and DB845c.

While at it, also sort the members of `struct qcom_llcc_config` to avoid
any holes in-between.

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10
Reported-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
index 7b7c5a38bac6..a5140f19f200 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
@@ -120,10 +120,11 @@ struct llcc_slice_config {
 
 struct qcom_llcc_config {
 	const struct llcc_slice_config *sct_data;
-	int size;
-	bool need_llcc_cfg;
 	const u32 *reg_offset;
 	const struct llcc_edac_reg_offset *edac_reg_offset;
+	int size;
+	bool need_llcc_cfg;
+	bool no_edac;
 };
 
 enum llcc_reg_offset {
@@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static const struct qcom_llcc_config sdm845_cfg = {
 	.need_llcc_cfg	= false,
 	.reg_offset	= llcc_v1_reg_offset,
 	.edac_reg_offset = &llcc_v1_edac_reg_offset,
+	.no_edac	= true,
 };
 
 static const struct qcom_llcc_config sm6350_cfg = {
@@ -1012,11 +1014,19 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	drv_data->ecc_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
 
-	llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
-					"qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
-					sizeof(*drv_data));
-	if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
-		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
+	/*
+	 * On some platforms, the access to EDAC registers will be locked by
+	 * the bootloader. So probing the EDAC driver will result in a crash.
+	 * Hence, disable the creation of EDAC platform device for the
+	 * problematic platforms.
+	 */
+	if (!cfg->no_edac) {
+		llcc_edac = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
+						"qcom_llcc_edac", -1, drv_data,
+						sizeof(*drv_data));
+		if (IS_ERR(llcc_edac))
+			dev_err(dev, "Failed to register llcc edac driver\n");
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 err:
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ