linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net: sunhme: Probe/IRQ cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <094ab51d-d99f-ee08-4e8b-946cc85ccfd6@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 20:36:56 -0400
From:   Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
        debian-sparc@...ts.debian.org, rescue@...help.org, sparc@...too.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net: sunhme: Probe/IRQ cleanups

On 3/13/23 20:27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 13:18:56 -0500 Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Well, I've had these patches kicking around in my tree since last October, so I
>> guess I had better get around to posting them. This series is mainly a
>> cleanup/consolidation of the probe process, with some interrupt changes as well.
>> Some of these changes are SBUS- (AKA SPARC-) specific, so this should really get
>> some testing there as well to ensure nothing breaks. I've CC'd a few SPARC
>> mailing lists in hopes that someone there can try this out. I also have an SBUS
>> card I ordered by mistake if anyone has a SPARC computer but lacks this card.
>>
>> I had originally planned on adding phylib support to this driver in the hopes of
>> being able to use real phy drivers, but I don't think I'm going to end up doing
>> that. I wanted to be able to use an external (homegrown) phy, but as it turns
>> out you can't buy MII cables in $CURRENTYEAR for under $250 a pop, and even if
>> you could get them you can't buy the connectors either. Oh well...
> 
> Doesn't apply to net-next, please note we're using the branch called
> *main* now.

Looks like I based this on another patch but forgot to send it. I've resent the series
with this patch squashed in.

--Sean