linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+Yvp7qj_420fk6UiPNB+dsRzRssPf4K=fMSNBoLB1oBiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:25:21 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the
 current thread

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 16:19, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/20, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> >  kernel/signal.c                               | 23 +++++-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> For the change in kernel/signal.c
>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Hi Thomas,

Do you have any remaining concerns about this patch?
Should I drop the test to not confuse people? Then it will be just a
few lines in signal.c.