[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230314004201.GS143566@dragon>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 08:42:01 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: dts: imx6dl-yapp43: Add support for new HW revision of the IOTA board
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 05:42:21PM +0100, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> > > + eeprom@57 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,24c128";
> > > + reg = <0x57>;
> > > + pagesize = <64>;
> > > + status = "okay";
> >
> > The "okay" status is only needed to flip a "disabled" one.
>
> OK, I will remove the status "okay" from all device nodes defined
> by this dtsi that should be enabled by default.
>
> I assume that using status "okay" (or "disabled") for referenced
> nodes coming from included SoC dtsi files is fine even if these
> nodes already have the required status at the moment.
Yeah, that would be fine.
Shawn
> Otherwise I see no guarantee that the node will have my required
> status in the future as well. The status in the included files
> may be changed by someone else for whatever reason.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists