[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7dTMBfb=ncQQE7m7vE_fL6dy4mSFCprGsvH8LsGLe1pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:42:36 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/5] md: fix uaf for sync_thread
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 1:32 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Our test reports a uaf for 'mddev->sync_thread':
>
> T1 T2
> md_start_sync
> md_register_thread
> raid1d
> md_check_recovery
> md_reap_sync_thread
> md_unregister_thread
> kfree
>
> md_wakeup_thread
> wake_up
> ->sync_thread was freed
>
> Currently, a global spinlock 'pers_lock' is borrowed to protect
> 'mddev->thread', this problem can be fixed likewise, however, there might
> be similar problem for other md_thread, and I really don't like the idea to
> borrow a global lock.
>
> This patchset do some refactor, and then use a disk level spinlock to
> protect md_thread in relevant apis.
>
> Yu Kuai (5):
> md: pass a md_thread pointer to md_register_thread()
> md: refactor md_wakeup_thread()
> md: use md_thread api to wake up sync_thread
> md: pass a mddev to md_unregister_thread()
> md: protect md_thread with a new disk level spin lock
Applied to md-next.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists