[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230314100651.GD1845660@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:06:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] static_call: Make NULL static calls consistent
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 06:58:36PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 10:48:58AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 8:17 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 05:20:04PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > 2) Create yet another "tier" of static call implementations, for
> > > > arches which can have the unfortunate combo of CFI_CLANG +
> > > > !HAVE_STATIC_CALL. CONFIG_ALMOST_DONT_HAVE_STATIC_CALL?
> > > >
> > > > The arch can define ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NOP() which uses inline
> > > > asm to create a CFI-compliant NOP/BUG/whatever version of the
> > > > function (insert lots of hand-waving). Is the kcfi hash available
> > > > to inline asm at build time?
> > >
> > > Yes, clang creates magic symbol for everything it sees a declaration
> > > for. This symbols can be referenced from asm, linking will make it all
> > > work.
> > >
> > > And yes, C sucks, you can't actually create a function definition from a
> > > type :/ Otherwise this could be trivially fixable.
> >
> > Wouldn't creating a separate inline assembly nop function that
> > references the CFI hash of another function with the correct type
> > potentially solve this issue like Josh suggested?
Yes it would, and the below looks about right. It's just a shame the C
language itself cannot sanely express that. Also, having a ton of silly
little nop functions is daft, but alas.
> Right, I was thinking something like this, where the nop function gets
> generated by DEFINE_STATIC_CALL().
>
> Completely untested of course...
>
> #define STATIC_CALL_NOP_PREFIX __SCN__
> #define STATIC_CALL_NOP(name) __PASTE(STATIC_CALL_NOP_PREFIX, name)
> #define STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) __stringify(STATIC_CALL_NOP(name))
>
> #define ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NOP(name, func) \
> asm(".align 4 \n" \
IIRC arm64 just changed (or is about to) their alignment muck. I think
you can write this like:
".balign " __stringify(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT) " \n" \
or somesuch...
> ".word __kcfi_typeid_" STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) " \n" \
> ".globl " STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) " \n" \
> STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) ": \n" \
> "bti c \n" \
> "mov x0, xzr \n" \
> "ret \n" \
> ".type " STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) ", @function \n" \
> ".size " STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) ", . - " STATIC_CALL_NOP_STR(name) " \n")
>
> #define DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(name, func) \
> extern struct static_call_key STATIC_CALL_KEY(name); \
> extern typeof(func) STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(name) \
> extern typeof(func) STATIC_CALL_NOP(name)
>
> #define DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func, _func_init) \
> DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func); \
> ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NOP(name); \
> struct static_call_key STATIC_CALL_KEY(name) = { \
> .func = _func_init, \
> }
> --
> Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists