lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20ebe4a3-1352-ae02-a56b-672ff3fcf12d@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:06:12 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/msm/dsi: Switch the QCM2290-specific
 compatible to index autodetection



On 14.03.2023 01:03, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-03-07 14:01:44, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Now that the logic can handle multiple sets of registers, move
>> the QCM2290 to the common logic and mark it deprecated. This allows us
>> to remove a couple of structs, saving some memory.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c     |  4 +++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c | 28 ++--------------------------
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> index 31fdee2052be..90d43628b22b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c
>> @@ -174,7 +174,9 @@ static int dsi_dev_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  
>>  static const struct of_device_id dt_match[] = {
>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,mdss-dsi-ctrl", .data = NULL /* autodetect cfg */ },
>> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290", .data = &qcm2290_dsi_cfg_handler },
>> +
>> +	/* Deprecated, don't use */
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,dsi-ctrl-6g-qcm2290", .data = NULL },
>>  	{}
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
>> index 6d4b2ce4b918..29ccd755cc2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_cfg.c
>> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sdm845_dsi_cfg = {
>>  	.bus_clk_names = dsi_v2_4_clk_names,
>>  	.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_v2_4_clk_names),
>>  	.io_start = {
>> -		{ 0xae94000, 0xae96000 }, /* SDM845 / SDM670 / SC7180 */
>> +		{ 0xae94000, 0xae96000 }, /* SDM845 / SDM670 */
>> +		{ 0x5e94000 }, /* QCM2290 / SM6115 / SM6125 / SM6375 */
>>  	},
>>  };
>>  
>> @@ -203,25 +204,6 @@ static const struct msm_dsi_config sc7280_dsi_cfg = {
>>  	},
>>  };
>>  
>> -static const char * const dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names[] = {
>> -	"iface", "bus",
>> -};
>> -
>> -static const struct regulator_bulk_data qcm2290_dsi_cfg_regulators[] = {
>> -	{ .supply = "vdda", .init_load_uA = 21800 },	/* 1.2 V */
>> -};
> 
> These two consts should really have already been deleted as part of
> 04/10: drm/msm/dsi: dsi_cfg: Deduplicate identical structs.
Right, will fix

> 
>> -static const struct msm_dsi_config qcm2290_dsi_cfg = {
>> -	.io_offset = DSI_6G_REG_SHIFT,
>> -	.regulator_data = qcm2290_dsi_cfg_regulators,
>> -	.num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(qcm2290_dsi_cfg_regulators),
>> -	.bus_clk_names = dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names,
>> -	.num_bus_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(dsi_qcm2290_bus_clk_names),
>> -	.io_start = {
>> -		{ 0x5e94000 },
>> -	},
>> -};
>> -
>>  static const struct msm_dsi_host_cfg_ops msm_dsi_v2_host_ops = {
>>  	.link_clk_set_rate = dsi_link_clk_set_rate_v2,
>>  	.link_clk_enable = dsi_link_clk_enable_v2,
>> @@ -312,9 +294,3 @@ const struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler *msm_dsi_cfg_get(u32 major, u32 minor)
>>  
>>  	return cfg_hnd;
>>  }
>> -
>> -/*  Non autodetect configs */
>> -const struct msm_dsi_cfg_handler qcm2290_dsi_cfg_handler = {
>> -	.cfg = &qcm2290_dsi_cfg,
>> -	.ops = &msm_dsi_6g_v2_host_ops,
>> -};
> 
> And how do you think dsi.c is able to reference this... don't forget to
> remove it from dsi_cfg.h in v4.  In fact, if you look at how this was
> implemented you should also be able to remove #include "dsi_cfg.h" from
> dsi.c.  A clean revert of that patch would be nice, or just use it as
> reference to find the remnants:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1644853060-12222-2-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org/
Ack

Konrad
> 
> - Marijn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ