lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230314122725.GI1845660@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:27:25 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.3-rc2

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 01:01:27PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:40, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > How does the following look like as a culprit?
> > >
> > > 62b95a7b44d1 (ARM: 9282/1: vfp: Manipulate task VFP state with softirqs disabled)
> >
> > Ooh yeah, that asm implementation of local_bh_{dis,en}able completely
> > miss out on the lockdep state tracking. Also I think it breaks RCU, note
> > how __local_bh_disable_ip() explicitly does rcu_read_lock() for the
> > first bh-disable.
> >
> 
> Thanks a lot for the diagnosis, doctor :-)
> 
> I may need some hand holding getting this fixed - probably better to
> run the C implementations wherever feasible, right?

That is certainly the easiest and least risky approach yes.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ