linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: dt-bindings: adi,adau17x1: Convert to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 16:36:22 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Vijaya Anand <sunrockers8@...il.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: dt-bindings: adi,adau17x1: Convert to DT
 schema

On 15/03/2023 01:09, Vijaya Anand wrote:
> Convert the binding document for adi,adau17x1 from txt to yaml
> so one could validate dt-entries correctly and any future additions
> can go into yaml format. Add address and size cells to example to
> prevent errors regarding reg format.

Why this is still RFC? RFC means it is not ready for applying, not full
review, just some glance and comments. Some maintainers will not apply
RFC patches at all. What do you question here?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Anand <sunrockers8@...il.com>
> Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - added 'Codec' in title to clarify type of devices
> - put compatible devices in lexographic order
> - changed description of clocks
> - changed 'unevaluatedProperties' to 'additionalProperties'
> - changed node names to be generic

Best regards,
Krzysztof