[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a45fc82-9339-d086-2e70-27fd91906b8a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 11:33:43 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
<jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
<sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
<eranian@...gle.com>, <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
<jarkko@...nel.org>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] x86/resctrl: Remove few unnecessary rftype flags
Hi Babu,
On 3/2/2023 12:24 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Remove few unnecessary rftype flags and simplify the code. This is done
Please drop "few" (here and in subject).
> to further cleanup the code eventually.
Could you please be specific? "further cleanup the code
eventually" is too vague. I do not understand what is meant
with the second sentence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 9 +++------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 8edecc5763d8..571145d75d29 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -243,12 +243,9 @@ struct rdtgroup {
> */
> #define RFTYPE_INFO BIT(0)
> #define RFTYPE_BASE BIT(1)
> -#define RF_CTRLSHIFT 4
> -#define RF_MONSHIFT 5
> -#define RF_TOPSHIFT 6
> -#define RFTYPE_CTRL BIT(RF_CTRLSHIFT)
> -#define RFTYPE_MON BIT(RF_MONSHIFT)
> -#define RFTYPE_TOP BIT(RF_TOPSHIFT)
> +#define RFTYPE_CTRL BIT(4)
> +#define RFTYPE_MON BIT(5)
> +#define RFTYPE_TOP BIT(6)
> #define RFTYPE_RES_CACHE BIT(8)
> #define RFTYPE_RES_MB BIT(9)
> #define RF_CTRL_INFO (RFTYPE_INFO | RFTYPE_CTRL)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 15ea5b550fe9..3c86506e54c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -3163,7 +3163,7 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
> {
> struct rdtgroup *prdtgrp, *rdtgrp;
> struct kernfs_node *kn;
> - uint files = 0;
> + uint fflags = 0;
Hoe does changing the variable name from "files" to "fflags" simplify
the code?
> int ret;
>
> prdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(parent_kn);
> @@ -3215,8 +3215,12 @@ static int mkdir_rdt_prepare(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
> goto out_destroy;
> }
>
> - files = RFTYPE_BASE | BIT(RF_CTRLSHIFT + rtype);
> - ret = rdtgroup_add_files(kn, files);
> + if (rtype == RDTCTRL_GROUP)
> + fflags = RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_CTRL;
> + else
> + fflags = RFTYPE_BASE | RFTYPE_MON;
> +
> + ret = rdtgroup_add_files(kn, fflags);
> if (ret) {
> rdt_last_cmd_puts("kernfs fill error\n");
> goto out_destroy;
>
>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists