lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-a62a57b8-4268-4c51-b79e-f5f6bd0c13a2@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     gerg@...nel.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
        macro@...am.me.uk
CC:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 0/2] riscv: support ELF format binaries in nommu mode

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:20:35 PST (-0800), gerg@...nel.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On 1/3/23 07:52, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 05:51:24 PST (-0800), gerg@...nel.org wrote:
>>> The following changes add the ability to run ELF format binaries when
>>> running RISC-V in nommu mode. That support is actually part of the
>>> ELF-FDPIC loader, so these changes are all about making that work on
>>> RISC-V.
>>>
>>> The first issue to deal with is making the ELF-FDPIC loader capable of
>>> handling 64-bit ELF files. As coded right now it only supports 32-bit
>>> ELF files.
>>>
>>> Secondly some changes are required to enable and compile the ELF-FDPIC
>>> loader on RISC-V and to pass the ELF-FDPIC mapping addresses through to
>>> user space when execing the new program.
>>>
>>> These changes have not been used to run actual ELF-FDPIC binaries.
>>> It is used to load and run normal ELF - compiled -pie format. Though the
>>> underlying changes are expected to work with full ELF-FDPIC binaries if
>>> or when that is supported on RISC-V in gcc.
>>>
>>> To avoid needing changes to the C-library (tested with uClibc-ng
>>> currently) there is a simple runtime dynamic loader (interpreter)
>>> available to do the final relocations, https://github.com/gregungerer/uldso.
>>> The nice thing about doing it this way is that the same program
>>> binary can also be loaded with the usual ELF loader in MMU linux.
>>>
>>> The motivation here is to provide an easy to use alternative to the
>>> flat format binaries normally used for RISC-V nommu based systems.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/elf.h         |   11 +++++++++-
>>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu.h         |    4 +++
>>>  arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h |    5 ++++
>>>  fs/Kconfig.binfmt                    |    2 -
>>>  fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c                |   38 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>  include/linux/elf-fdpic.h            |   14 +++++++++++-
>>>  include/uapi/linux/elf-fdpic.h       |   15 +++++++++++++
>>>  7 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> Adding Damien, as IIRC he's had some hacked up userspace bits for the K210.  I'm yet to get anything running, but it'd be great if we get this to a point where I can actually boot test this on QEMU (I'm just doing builds now).
>
> This is a simple script I user to generate a working QEMU example:
>
>    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gregungerer/simple-linux/master/build-riscvnommu-linux-uclibc-elf.sh
>
> It does reference some configs here https://github.com/gregungerer/simple-linux/tree/master/configs
> and this posted patchset as https://github.com/gregungerer/simple-linux/tree/master/patches (this is
> just these 2 patches combined as a single patch).
>
>
>> Given that it's the second week of the merge window and this is a bunch of new uABI it seems best to hold off until the next cycle.  I poked around and don't see anything wrong, but I'll try and take a more detailed look after the merge window.
>
> Oh, yeah, no hurry.

Maciej and Damien: I'm fine taking this, but not in any rush.  I'd 
rather get the uABI right if things are still in flight, but if we're 
all just waiting for something to get merged first then I'm fine with 
that being Linux.

>
> Regards
> Greg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ