[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdb828ad-855d-f7bc-d23e-17ed50750768@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 12:24:08 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@...il.com>
Cc: Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, lars@...afoo.de, jic23@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Outreachy Linux Kernel <outreachy@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Outreachy
On 3/15/23 07:03, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 03:17:28PM +0200, Menna Mahmoud wrote:
>> Hi Mentors,
>>
>>
>> I am Menna, Outreachy applicant and I work on my clean-up patches.
>>
>> Is it Okay to work on this error reported by checkpatch script?
>>
>>
>> drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c
>> --------------------------------------
>> ERROR: Use 4 digit octal (0777) not decimal permissions
>> #256: FILE: drivers/staging/iio/frequency/ad9832.c:256:
>> +static IIO_DEV_ATTR_FREQ(0, 1, 0200, NULL, ad9832_write, AD9832_FREQ1HM);
>
> What??? Is it complaining about the 0200? That is octal. Why is
> checkpatch complaining about this? Am I wrong? Maybe I am misreading.
>
> I could investigate, but I am leaving that task to you. It may be that
> checkpatch has a problem and you can fix that instead.
>
Yes, checkpatch seems to be confused here.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists