linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 19:25:44 +0000
From:   Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
To:     Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
        claudio@...dence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it,
        bristot@...hat.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, Rick Yiu <rickyiu@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
 in cpusets

On 03/15/23 17:18, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 15/03/23 14:49, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > On 03/15/23 12:18, Juri Lelli wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > +void inc_dl_tasks_cs(struct task_struct *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct cpuset *cs = task_cs(p);
> > 
> > nit:
> > 
> > I *think* task_cs() assumes rcu_read_lock() is held, right?
> > 
> > Would it make sense to WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held()) to at least
> > annotate the deps?
> 
> Think we have that check in task_css_set_check()?

Yes you're right, I didn't go forward enough in the call stack.

It seems to depend on PROVE_RCU, which sounds irrelevant, but I see PROVE_RCU
is actually an alias for PROVE_LOCKING.


Cheers

--
Qais Yousef