[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBItlBhzo+YETcJO@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 21:41:56 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Zeng Chao <chao.zeng@...mens.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, tony@...mide.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>
Subject: Wrong RS485 RTS polarity in 8250 OMAP UART Driver vs DT binding?
Hello all,
I have been recently working on RS485 on a TI K3 AM62 (using 8250_omap.c
driver) and there is something that I do not really understand about
the RTS polarity.
According to the DT binding (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/rs485.yaml)
when `rs485-rts-active-low` is present the behavior should be "drive RTS
low when sending", however in the code it seems that this is handled the
opposite way (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c:861).
/*
* Retain same polarity semantics as RS485 software emulation,
* i.e. SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND means driving RTS low on send.
*/
We have working hardware, using another UART that expect
rs485-rts-active-low, and the exact same HW, when using OMAP uart,
requires rs485-rts-active-high (the HW is modular, so we are really just
changing the uart, keeping the same RS485 transceiver / connections).
What's going on there? Is the semantic of the 8250_omap driver just the
opposite as it should be? Am I doing something wrong in the device tree?
This is the relevant DTS part.
&main_uart1 {
linux,rs485-enabled-at-boot-time;
rs485-rts-active-high;
rs485-rx-during-tx;
status = "okay";
};
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists