[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230316000453.553bf6a8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:04:53 +0200
From: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mischief@...blast.org,
de99like@...nucci.debian.net, holger.kiehl@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (nct6775) update ASUS WMI monitoring list
A520/B360/B460/B550...
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:58:24 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 3/15/23 14:30, Denis Pauk wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 23:01:35 +0200
> > Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tested-by: Holger Kiehl <holger.kiehl@....de>
> >
> > Pro A520M-C II/CSM is also tested by Holger Kiehl
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-hwmon/patch/868bdc4f-9d45-475c-963e-f5232a8b95@praktifix.dwd.de/
> >
> > Could it be applied as single patch or need to rebase over "Pro A520M-C II"
> > patch?
> >
> Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I just applied all
> patches in sequence as received, with no conflicts. Should I undo that ?
>
> Guenter
>
No, Thank you!
I just like to mention that Holger Kiehl sent separate patch with
"Pro A520M-C II" support and it could create conflicts. I have found it only
when I have sent my patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists